Empower your legal journey with our comprehensive legal resocurces

Historical Perspective of Local Government in Tanzania


Definition and Introduction

Local government refers collectively to administrative authorities over areas that are smaller than a state. The term is used to contrast with offices at nation-state level, which are referred to as the central government, national government, or (where appropriate) federal government. "Local government" only acts within powers delegated to it by legislation or directives of the higher level of government.

Common names for local government entities include state, province, region, department, county, prefecture, district, city, township, town, borough, parish, municipality, shire and village.

For administrative purposes, Tanzania is divided into 26 regions; 21 on the mainland, 3 on Zanzibar, and 2 on Pemba. 99 districts have been created to further increase local authority. These districts are also now referred to as local government authorities. Currently there are 114 councils operating in 99 districts, 22 are urban and 92 are rural. The 22 urban units are classified further as city (Dar es Salaam, Tanga, Mbeya, Arusha and Mwanza), municipal (Dodoma, Iringa, Kilimanjaro, Morogoro, Shinyanga, Tabora), and town councils.

Historical Perspective of Local Government in Tanzania

The mainland Tanzania has a long history of functioning local government, starting with the Native Authorities Ordinance in 1926. There was a ten year break, as in 1972 the local government was abolished and replaced with a direct central government rule. The reintroduction of the local government occurred in the beginning of the 1980s (1982) when the rural councils and rural authorities were re-established. Local government Elections took place in 1983 and the establishment of functioning councils in 1984. In 1993 the one-party political system was abandoned and replaced with a multi-party system of government, the first multi-party elections taking place in 1995. Following the liberalisation of the political field, was a major public sector reform, which included a Local government Reform Programme (LGRP). The LGRP covered four areas: political decentralization, financial decentralization, administrative decentralization and changed central-local relations, with the mainland government having over-riding powers within the framework of the Constitution.

This process of local government reform is still on-going. It aims to promote democratic, accountable and autonomous local government authorities, with wide discretionary powers and a strong financial base implemented by 2011.

In the case of Zanzibar, the 1964 revolution not only abolished the Monarchy but also did away with the separation of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary, fusing all their functions into a revolutionary council. Since the promulgation of Zanzibar's first post-revolution constitution in 1979, Zanzibar has, however, passed various pieces of legislation on local government. At the moment, Zanzibar is developing a programme for local government with the assistance of the United Nations.

LEGAL FOUNDATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES IN TANZANIA

Local Government is a non-Union matter. It is nonetheless enshrined in the Union constitution as well as in the constitutions of the mainland and Zanzibar. In mainland Tanzania, the Constitution of the United Republic 1977, Articles 145 and 146 states that the National Assembly or the House of Representatives must provide for local government through legislation. Article 146 provides that one of the objectives of the local government is to enhance the democratic process within its area of jurisdiction and to apply the democracy for facilitating the expeditious and faster development of the people.

In relation to the local government in the mainland the main legislation are:

(a) The Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977

(b) Government (Urban Authorities) Act, 1982

(c) Local Government Finance Act, 1982

(d) Urban Authorities (Rating ) Act, 1983

(e) Regional Administration Act, 1997

(f) Local Government Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 1999

(g) The Local Authorities Provident Fund Act (Act No. 6 of 2000)

(h) The Local Government Authorities (Decoration of Buildings) Act (Act No. 9 of 1968)

(i) The Regions and Districts (Establishment Procedure) Act (Act No. 12 of 1994)

Note: the Local Government Services Act 1982 has been repealed, recently.

In Zanzibar, the relevant part of the Constitution 1984 is Article 128. The main legislation regarding Local Government are:

(a) Zanzibar Municipal Council Act, 1995

(b) District and Town Councils Act, 1995

Note: The minister of state in the President's Office - Regional Administration and Local Governments (PO-RALG) is responsible for the administration of this legislation.

Aim of Local Government in Tanzania

Local Government Authorities exist for the purpose of consolidating and giving more power to the people to competently participate in the planning and implementation of development programmes within their respective areas and generally throughout the country. In modern nations, local governments usually have some of the same kind of powers as national governments do. For instance, they have some power to raise taxes, though these may be limited by central legislation.

FUNCTIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT

All Local Government Authorities are mandated to play three main functions; Article 146 (2) (a)-(c) i.e.;

(i) Maintenance of law, order and good governance

(ii) Promotion of economic and social welfare of the people in their jurisdiction  

(iii) Ensuring effective and equitable delivery of qualitative and quantitative services to the people within their areas of jurisdiction

In addition to the basic functions, all local governments are charged with seven other functions and duties, as follows: [Refer, Party V of the Local Government (District) Authorities Act].

(a) Formulation, coordination and supervision of the implementation of all plans for economic, industrial and social development in their areas of jurisdiction.

(b) Monitoring and controlling the performance of duties and functions of the council and its staff.

(c) Ensuring the collection and proper utilization of the revenues of the council

(d) Making by-laws applicable throughout their areas of jurisdiction, and considering and improving by-laws made by village councils within their areas of jurisdiction.

(e) Ensuring, regulating and coordinating development plans, projects and programmes of villages and township authorities within their areas of jurisdiction.

(f) Regulating and monitoring the collection and utilization of revenue of village councils and township authorities.

(g) Subject to the laws in force, doing all such acts and things as may be done by a people's government.

STRUCTURE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES

Types of Local Government in Tanzania

Local Government Authorities are classified into two major categories;

(a) Urban authorities

They are responsible for the administration and development of urban areas ranging from townships, municipalities and Cities.

(b) Rural Authorities

They are commonly known as District Councils.

Note: the local government is divided into urban and rural authorities both on the mainland and Zanzibar. 

ON THE MAINLAND TANZANIA; urban authorities consist of city councils, municipal councils and town councils, whereas included in the rural authorities are the district councils with township council and village council authorities.

The district and urban councils have autonomy in their geographic area. District councils coordinate the activities of the township authorities and village councils, which are accountable to the district for all revenues received for day-to-day administration. The village and township councils have the responsibility for formulating plans for their areas.

In Zanzibar: urban authorities are made up of town councils and municipalities, while rural authorities comprise of district councils.

In both locations, below the local authorities there are a number of democratic bodies to debate local development needs. In the rural system, the vitongoji, the smallest unit of a village, is composed of an elected chairperson who appoints a secretary and three further members all of whom serve on an advisory committee. In the Urban areas streets (mitaa) i.e. is the smallest unit within the ward of an urban authority.

Unlike suburbs (vitongoji), the Mtaa Committees have a fully elected membership comprising of a chairperson, six members and an executive officer. (Ref. Sections 16-19 of Local Government (Urban) Authorities Act.

A: RURAL (DISTRICT) LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES

Local Government (District) Authorities Act of 1982 creates district based local government authorities in Tanzania. The Act provides, inter alia, the establishment, composition, functions and legislative powers of district, township councils and village authorities.

At the village level, the government structure is comprised of a village assembly consisting of all persons aged 18 and above. The corporate entity of a registered village is the village council comprising of a chairman or chairperson elected by the village assembly. There are also village committees covering such matters as planning, finance, economic affairs, social services, security, forest protection, water resources etc [Sections 146-147].

The village council's functions and roles include planning and coordinating activities, rendering assistance and advice to the villagers engaged in agriculture, forestry, horticultural, industrial or any other activity, and to encourage village residents to undertake and participate in communal enterprises. Propose by-laws must be adopted by the village assembly before being submitted to the District Council for approval [Section 169]. In addition, Section 29 of the Act provides for division of districts into wards. As an administrative subdivision between the village and the district, the ward reviews the proposed village council's projects in its jurisdiction and approves them for passage up the line to the District Development Committee.

Local Government (District) Authorities Act of 1982 as amended by Act No. 6 of 1999 establishes the Ward Development Council (hereinafter referred to as "WDC). The WDC is comprised of a councillor representing the ward in the District Development Council and chairpersons of all village councils within the ward. The WDC also includes member(s) of the district council, who ordinarily reside in the ward; and invitees from, for instance NGOs and other civic groups involved in the promotion of development in the ward. However, the invitees have no right to vote in the meetings. The WDC is responsible for developing general development plans for the ward. Further, the WDC must manage disasters and environmental related activities within its ward.

At the district level, there is a district council composed of members elected from each ward; members of parliament representing constituencies within the area of the district council; three members appointed by the minister responsible for the local government and one member representing the constituent village councils on a rotational basis. [Section 35(1), Act Number 7 of 1982].

District Councils; through the appropriate District Development Committee (hereinafter referred to as "the DDC") supervise the implementation of all plans for economic, commercial, industrial and social development in their respective areas. Also, the council approves by-laws made by the village councils and co-ordinates plans, projects and programmes for the villages within its area of jurisdiction. Apart from the DDC, there are other council committees. These committees are for finance, administration and planning; education, health and water; and economic affairs and environment.

B: URBAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES

Local Government (Urban Authorities) Act of 1982 [Act Number 8 of 1982] provides for the establishment, composition, functions and legislative powers of the urban based local government authorities (urban councils) in Tanzania. The urban council is comprised of the governing bodies for townships, municipalities and City Council (Commission).

Composition of a town council is provided for under section 24 of Act 8 of 1982. Township councils cannot have more than three members appointed by the local minister of government affairs. The council is comprised of members elected from the ward within the town and members of parliament representing constituents within the town [Section 24(1)]. The elected members then elect a chairman and vice-chairman for each town council.

A Municipal Council is made up of members elected from wards within the municipality; member of the parliament representing the constituencies within the municipality; not more than three (3) members appointed by the minister responsible for the local government affairs from among the residents of the municipality [Section 24(2)].

Section 8 and 25 (3) of Act No. 8 of 1982 provides for the establishment of City Councils. City councils are composed of one member elected form each wards within the city; the members of the Parliament representing constituencies within the area of the city council; and not more than three (3) members appointed from the residents of the city [section 24 (4)].

Each town council, municipal or city council has a Chairman, vice-chairman, Mayor and a Deputy Mayor respectively [Section 20]. The chairman and vice-chairman of a town council, and the Mayor and the Deputy Mayor of a municipal council and a city council, are elected by members of the councils from amongst the elected members of the urban authorities.

Section 47 of Act number 8 of 1982 provides for the establishment of the urban authorities committees who are in charge of finance and administration; economic affairs, health and education; and urban planning and environment. The city council shall establish such committees as may be determined by the minister in the order establishing it.

The objectives and functions of the urban authorities are provided for under PART V & VI of Act number 8 of 1982. These functions include: facilitating the maintenance of peace, order and good governance; and promoting the social welfare and economic well-being of the local community. Urban authorities are expected to further the social and economic development of their areas; take the necessary measures for the suppression of crimes and protection of public and private property; regulate and improve agriculture, trade, commerce and industry; further and enhance health, education, and the social, cultural and recreational life or of the people; and to eradicate poverty and distress.

Urban authorities may, subject to the consent of the proper officers pass applicable bylaws to their areas. [Sections 88-90 (1)] Urban authorities are required to give public notice to the local inhabitants of the intention to make the bylaws for comments [Section 90(1)]. After the expiration of the notice, the draft bylaws must be submitted to the Minister for approval and be gazetted.

It is important to note that the local governments are not replicated at the regional level. However, regional commissioners, secretaries and officials (who form Part of the regional administration), like the local governments, are responsible to the Minister for Local Government and Regional Administration. Normally, the regional authorities provide technical advice and support and exercise supervision to the District councils. Under section 12 of the Regional Administration Act, 1997 [Act No. 19/1997], it is provided that it shall be the duty of the Regional secretariat to facilitate the functions of the local government authorities within the region. However, the experience is that the regional administration can put heavy pressure on the local authorities and veto their development plans and programmes.

MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES ON THE TOPIC:

Local Government Elections across the United Republic of Tanzania, elections to the local government are held every five years, under the first-past-the-post system with universal adult suffrage at 18. 

On the mainland Tanzania, chairpersons and mayors are indirectly elected by the elected members of their respective authorities. Village councils are elected by the village assembly comprising all adults over the age of 18.

The urban and district councils are made up of the members elected from each ward; the MPs representing the constituency, within which the urban area is situated and women members, appointed by the National Electoral Commission from the proposals submitted by the political parties in proportion to the number of elected positions held on the council (including MPs). The number of women appointed to the council is not less than one-third of ward representatives and the MPs combined.

Included in the membership of the city councils are all the Mayors from the urban authorities within its jurisdiction, all MPs representing constituencies within its area, at least two women MPs resident in the city and elected from the women in parliament, and three councillors from each urban council, one of whom must be a woman.

Township authorities encompass the chairperson of the 'vitongoji'(suburbs) with its area, not more than three members appointed by the district council, and women appointed according to political proportionality to make up at least one-third of the authority.

Village councils have between 15 and 25 members. These consist of a chairperson elected by the village assembly, all chairpersons of the vitongoji within its area and other members elected by the village assembly. Women must account for 25 % of the council members. The term of office for all councillors is five years.

Offices and appointment

The head of the paid service is the District Executive Director in the district authorities and the Town/Municipal/City Director in the urban authorities. Typically, below the Director there are a number of Heads of Department. The Departments are many and may include the following: personnel and administration; planning and finance; engineering or works; education and culture; trade and economic affairs; urban planning; health and social welfare; co-operative, agriculture and livestock development; and community development.

Central government appoints the chief officers through the process of open bidding. City council directors are appointed by the president, while directors of town, municipal and district councils are appointed by the Minister. The Minister also appoints the heads of departments after a recruitment process.

The responsibility to recruit and dismiss senior officers is, at the moment, being devolved to local governments.

Decision Making Systems of Local Government: Residents' Participation

The most important, intended links between the local government and the residents of the given area are the vitongoji in the rural areas and the urban Mtaa committees, which are designed to mobilise citizen participation in local development.

Priorities for local service delivery and development projects are brought to the Mtaa committees for discussion before being forwarded to the Ward Development Committee (WDC). In the rural system proposals reach the WDC via the village council.     

In addition to the above, citizen participation in the local government decision-making is encouraged by the amendments to the Local Government (District Authorities) Act 1982, which provide for Councils to organise public hearings for people to question political leaders and staff. Councils have also been empowered to establish special kinds of service boards, open to all citizens in the area and providing an opportunity to influence service provision.

Participatory budget-making has also become a mean to increase resident participation. It is currently enabled by the bottom-up budgeting through the ward development committees and the democratic structures above them.

REVENUE

Local authorities can also raise revenue locally. The main sources of local income come from:

(a) Fees including taxi registration, bus stand/station, forestry products, valuation, scaffolding, inoculation and ambulance

(b) Licences including road, liquor

(c) Property taxes and rents

(d) Charges including for refuse collection, cess, hire of vehicles, markets

(e) Fines

(f) Others including sale of assets and recovery of public fund.

………………………………………..

How to write legal essay and answer scenario questions in exams



By saidi kassim, Bachelor of laws, Moshi cooperative university

1. General citation of authorities
One of the most important requirements for answering questions on the law is that you must be able to back the points you make with authority, usually either a case or a statue. It is not good enough to state that the law is such and such, without stating the case or statute which says that that is the law.

Higher marks will be given where the candidate has cited authorities by name; quite simply it helps to give the impression that you know your material thoroughly, rather than half-remembering something you heard once in class.

This means that you must be prepared to learn fairly long lists of cases. For exam purposes you need to memorise the name of the case, a brief description of the facts, and the legal principle which the case established. Once you have revised a topic well, you should find that a surprisingly high number of cases on that topic begin to stick in your mind anyway, but there will probably be some that you have trouble recalling.

Knowing the names of cases makes you look more knowledgeable, and also saves writing time in the exam, but if you do forget a name, referring briefly to the facts will identify it. It is not necessary to learn that the dates of cases, though it is useful if you know whether it is a recent or an old case. N.B Dates are usually required for statutes.

You need to know the facts of a case in order to judge whether it applies to the situation in a problem question. However, unless you are making a detailed comparison of the facts of a case and the facts of a problem question, in order to argue that the case should or could be distinguished, you should generally make only brief reference to facts, if at all – long descriptions of facts waste time and earn few marks.

2. Is there always a right answer?

In law exams, there is not usually a right or wrong answer. What matters is that you show you know what type of issues you are being asked about. Essay questions are likely to ask you to ‘discuss’, ‘criticize’, or ‘evaluate’, or ‘examine’. You simply need to produce a good range of factual and critical material in order to do this. Please do not reproduce large chucks of lecture notes! The lecturer will want to see evidence that you understand the topic you are writing about.

History Of Local Government System In Tanzania


Introduction

Local authorities were established in Tanzania over 100 years ago. Periods to be covered include the pre-colonial period, the colonial era, the period after independence up to 1972~ the period between 1972 and 1984 and the period between 1984 and 1998. The ongoing Local Government Reform Process dominates the period after 1998.


The Pre-Colonial Period -1884 -1918

Before the colonial era and during the initial period of the colonial era, local communities were organized around chiefs in chiefdoms. Councilor elders who were their close advisors surrounded chiefs. In Kilimanjaro Region, for example, the Chagga chief was called MANGI, the Hehe called him MTWA and the Nyamwezi called him MTEMI. Besides these advisors, the chiefs had lieutenants who were known as sub-chiefs. Under the sub-chiefs, there were headmen. In geographical terms, chiefdoms were more or less equivalent to the current administrative units known as divisions, sub-chiefdoms were equivalent to the present day wards and headmen had a couple of villages to control. There were no districts or regions except tribal boundaries.


The Colonial Period

When the Germans colonized the country, they set in clear Provincial District and Chiefdom boundaries. They abolished the chiefdoms and established the post of the District Commissioner (DC). But when the British were mandated to administer Tanganyika (now Tanzania Mainland) in 1918, they adopted a different approach. In the urban areas, they enacted the Township Ordinance (Cap.101) in 1920. Subsequently, urban local governments were established. In the rural areas the DC was retained. It was until 1926 that the foundation for an organized local government system was laid down following the establishment of Native Authorities (NAs) by enacting the Native Authorities Ordinance (Cap 72). With it, the chiefs were reinstated. In 1928 the colonial administration introduced provincial commissioners (PCs). Both the DCs and PCs were trained and experienced administrators who were assisted by District Officers (DO).

After World War II, the colonial administration set in motion a profound change in local governance. As a result the government passed the Municipalities Ordinance (Cap 105) in 1947 to replace cap 101. In the following year (1948), the Dar es Salaam Municipal Council was established.

A few years later (1953) Local Government Ordinance (cap 333) was enacted to introduce the structure of local government governance that lasted up to 1972. Both of these ordinances aimed at establishing self governing and democratic Local Governments Authorities throughout the country. A major feature of the local government authorities at that time was that they were not only closely related to the level of funds available but also reflected the felt needs of their residents.


The Period Between 1961-1972

After independence in 1961, the government abolished the old NAs and created an entirely new structure of Councils covering the whole country. These LGAs were established more on political rather than on economic considerations. Hither to (1961) there were only 17 Councils, but by 1972, this number had risen to 68. These Councils were composed of elected Councilors with a small number of appointed members. No provision was made for elected bodies below the Districts or Town Council thus narrowing the scope of democratically elected local governments. Tanzania has had clear policy objectives regarding overall development. Ever since independence in 1961, the government identified three key enemies of the people as being poverty, illiteracy and disease. Some structures of implementation such as decentralized institutions were devised at various levels to try to execute strategies to achieve these goals. The central government, local governments and other institutions such as NGOs and Churches also ran schools, dispensaries and water schemes.

In the course of time though, local government authorities fell out of favour with both their residents and subsequently the central government. Reasons for this were many and varied, including:-

1. Expansion of services with meager financial resources to fund them.

2. Lack of qualified personnel.

3. Gross mismanagement of funds collected and granted by Central Government.

4. Little or no capacity to maintain and run a lot of infrastructure constructed by the

Central Government.

5. Council Officials and Councilors lacked the necessary experience and technical know how to run and manage local authorities.

6. Relationship between local authority staff and councilors was always sour on account of Councilors\' refusal to take part in campaigns for tax collection, fight over sitting allowances, demands for special treatment e.g. offices and vehicles for personal use, high influence when awarding contracts, etc.

7. It was at this period, that there was serious decline of council revenues, since the government had abolished two major local taxes, namely the local rates in 1969 and the produce cess in 1970 and Central Government was unable to compensate the Councils. This led to poor performance by the Councils.

As a result, local authorities were abolished; District Authorities on 30/6/1972 and Urban Authorities on 30/6/1973. They were replaced by a direct Central Government rule, in a policy popularly known as "decentralization". At the time of their abolition, there were 66 rural/district councils and 15 urban councils in Tanzania .


The period between 1972-1984 (Decentralization Era)

Institutionally, the government switched from partnership to direct management of the development process and provision of social services. A number of committees were established in the villages, wards, districts and regions, as vehicles for people/'s participation and Regions became the primary focus for rural development planning and implementation.


Manifestations

1.  Urban Councils merged with neighbouring rural councils.

2.  Government focus and emphasis was on "Rural Ujamaa Socialism".

3. There was big extension of Central Government Authority and control to

village level (speeding up development). People had to realize and enjoy the fruits of independence.

4. Decentralization era culminated in deconcentration of the Central Government for all social services and economic development needs.

In the course of implementation of decentralization policy, the following problems

emerged:

5. Government expenditure increased tremendously, bureaucracy extended to villages and regions and districts were not allowed to tax and raise their own revenue. All funds for recurrent and capital investment came from the national budget.

 Genuine people/'s participation was almost impossible due to the absence of councils.

The relatively large distances between centers within a region and the difficulties of accessibility and communication bottlenecks made participation martially impossible,

Sustainability of projects was difficult because of lack of democratically elected representation, empowerment and accountability.

As a result of the above mentioned problems, the following happened:

·  Primary Schools lacked text books

Buildings remained unmaintained

· No refuse collection and disposal particularly in urban centres

· Drains and sewers remained unblocked.

·  Lack of Roads maintenance.

· Dispensaries lacked essential drugs.

·  Representation of people greatly weakened

· Serious outbreak of cholera in many urban areas between 1976 -1980.


Generally, the outcome was that:

. The standard of living of the people was falling.

. Social services collapsed due to high operations and maintenance costs as shown above.

. School enrollment started to decline and literacy rate increased.


Government Intervention

Cholera outbreak and other problems as described above prompted the government to set up an investigation team led by the late Shekilango which recommended reinstatement of urban local authorities.


Re-Establishment of Local Government Authorities

Urban Councils Act No?restored Town and Municipal Councils on 1/7/1978. ll of 1978.


Problems Faced

I.  Legally, urban authorities were not empowered to raise revenue of their own.

2.  Whatever they collected, they did so as agents of the Central Government and all collections were

immediately and directly sent to the Treasury.

3. The new Town and Municipal Councils depended wholly on the Central Government for their finances.

4. Funds received from Central Government were insufficient and as such, no development projects were undertaken during this interim period.

5. Parks and Gardens in most urban authorities dried up.


Towards Reforming Local Government

In 1980, the Ruling Political Party (CCM) ordered the Government to revive the Local Government System in the whole country. In 1982 legislations; Acts No.7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 were enacted by the National Assembly. Constitutional amendments of 1984 that reinstated power to the people through sound Local Governments under Clauses 8, 145 and 146 reinforced this change. Local Government elections took place in 1983 and Acts No.7 and 8 reintroduced rural and urban Local Government Authorities respectively effective from January 1984. In early 1990 the Government embarked on Public Service Reform Programme (PSRP). Political reforms followed in 1992 when Tanzania re-introduced Multi-Party Democracy.


The Period Between 1984 -1998

The reintroduction of LGAs raised hopes for an improved performance through greater involvement of citizens. These hopes were however not realized due to a number of reasons. The anticipated improved performance in service delivery as well as development initiatives through broad-based public involvement was not being achieved as anticipated.

Several studies were carried out to establish reasons for this failure, and the following were identified as being some of the underlying reasons:


 The human resource capacity and management was weak and this seriously constrained performance by Local Government Authorities.

·          Weak leadership and poor management of the councils.

·          Shortage of properly qualified, disciplined and committed personnel.

·          Shortage of revenue due to narrow tax base.

·         Over-employment within the Councils.

·         Lack of transparency and accountability in the conduct of Councils\' business.


The Local Government Reform Programme (LGRP )

The local government reform programme was formulated and implemented by the government in order to address the problems which constrained the performance of the local government authorities as mentioned above. Through the programme, the government intends to strengthen local authorities and transform them to be effective instruments of social and economic development at local level. This has been addressed by the government in "A Local Government Reform Policy paper of 1998. The policy paper was preceded by Reform Agenda (1996 -2000). The main goal (long-term) of LGRP is to contribute to the Government/'s efforts of reducing the proportion of Tanzanians living in poverty. Its purpose is to improve quality, access and equitable delivery of public services, particularly to the poor. These must be provided through reformed and autonomous local authorities.

The reform aims at:-

(a) Letting people participate in government, at Local level and elect their leaders e.g. Councilors, Mtaa and Kitongoji leaders etc.

(b) Bringing public services under the control of people through their local councils.

(c) Giving Local Councils powers (Political devolution) over all local affairs.

(d) Determining the appropriate and cost effective organizational structures for local government authorities.

(e) Improving financial and political accountability.

(f) Securing finances for better public services.

(g) Creating a new local government administration answerable to local councils and to local needs.

(h) De-linking local administrative leaders from their former ministries.

(i) Creating new central -local relations based not on orders but on legislation and dialogue.

g) To create good governance based on political and financial accountability, democratic procedures and public participation.

Areas to be Reformed

The ongoing Local Government Reforms can generally be classified into two types, namely Systemic and non Systemic Reforms. Systemic reforms address the issues of Fiscal Decentralization, Legal Harmonization and Human Resources Autonomy, while non systemic ones refer to Governance, Restructuring, PORALG/RS Capacity Building and Programme Coordination.




1.The Democratic Dimension

The Local Government Reform aims at decentralizing by devolution powers and the setting of the rules for councils and committees, the chairperson etc. This will include integration of the previously centralized or de concentrated service sector into a holistic local government system by installing councils as the most important local, political body within its jurisdiction. This will strengthen local democratic institutions, enhance public participation and bring control to the people.

2. Financial Decentralization

This aims at giving Local Authorities more sources of revenue and enhances accountability in the expenditure of the revenue. The government has introduced unconditional and conditional block grants in sectors of education, health, roads, water and agricultural services.

3. Administrative Dimension

This involves local government personnel integrating them in the local governments from ministerial subordination, and restructuring local government administration. Local governments will be able to recruit their own staff, organized in a way decided by respective councils in order to improve service delivery. The local government staffs are accountable to local councils. Each council will revisit its structure and functions to ensure that they reflect the needs and conditions in the area under its jurisdiction.


4. The Central - Local Relations

The role of the central government and its agencies will be to formulate policies and guidelines, support and facilitation, monitoring and quality assurance and control within the frame work of the law. The minister responsible for local government will coordinate central-local relations and manage the interfaces with the sectoral ministries on matters relating to local government.


5. Service Function

Decentralized public service to bring service provision and management to end users while increasing the services, quantity and quality.

The Local Government Reform Programme has seven OUTCOME AREAS

1. Good Governance

2. Local Government Restructuring

3. Finance

4 . Human Resource development.

5. Institutional and Legal Framework.

6. President/'s Office, Regional Administration and Local Government.

7. Reform Co-ordination.

Achievements in Local Government Reforms since 1996

There have been some remarkable achievements since the reforms started in 1996 - 2004. These are:-

1. Democracy has been strengthened at the grass-root .

At all levels, election of political leaders at Village, Mtaa and Kitongoji level has successfully been conducted. Every level has a chairperson and a governing committee, which has been elected democratically. The most recent multiparty local elections were conducted nation wide in November 2004 for all the Vitongoji, Mitaa, and Villages in the country.


2. Restructuring of the Regional Administration

Up until June 1996, the regional level had what were known as Regional Development Directorates as independent government departments, headed by Regional Development Directors (RDDs). In June 1996, these were restructured into Regional Secretariats which are organized into five clusters, each headed by Assistant Administrative Secretary (AAS) under the overall leadership of the Regional Administrative Secretary (RAS). The five clusters under each RAS are:

Staff Function,

Management Support Services,

Economic Development Support Services,

Physical Planning and Engineering Support Services,

Social Sector Support Services.

The Regional Secretariats are charged with the responsibility of backstopping the local government authorities within their areas of jurisdiction.


3. Amendment of Local Government Laws

Most of the outdated by laws have been amended through Act. No.6 of 1999. The amendments focused on good governance, transparency and accountability . Other legislations are in the process of being amended.


4. Code of Conduct Regulations

The government has prepared and enacted codes of conduct for Councilors and the Staff of LGAs. Each one of them is bound to adhere to these codes of conduct.


5. Good Governance

There have been big achievements in the area of good governance. The Government has established some bench marks, through which different Councils are gauged on, and results show improvement in the scores.


6. Financial Management

On the aspect of financial management, there has been a lot of improvement, with the introduction of Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS).

7. Human Resource Improvement Benchmarking

An assessment made on human resource management, the trend has shown that, there has been an improvement in this area. The LGAs which have completed the reform process have determined their manning levels and effected retrenchments as well as recruitment of qualified staff where necessary.


Conclusion

Since the Local Government Reforms started in 2000, there has been a commendable improvement in the functioning of the LGAs. The quality of services rendered is satisfactory. With time, autonomy to LGAs is more vivid, efficient performance by the staff is taking roots, resulting in good discharge of their duties, transparency and accountability to the people and enabling the people to participate in planning and execution of local authority duties and responsibilities. The LGAs are still facing financial and human resources constraints. More improvement is desired to enable the LGAs to deliver services efficiently, effectively and responsively.